Andre:
Hi Willblake , are you serious or are you being facetious?
Willblake2
Perhaps I am displaying the my simplicity, but if individual
consciousness does not exist, what is the I that is seeing though my eyes?

Andre:
Perhaps we have all been hynotised into thinking that there is an 'I'
Willblake2.
Pirsig suggests that the confusion lies in the language we have inherited:
"This Cartesian 'Me' this autonomous little homunculus who sits behind our
eyeballs looking out through them in order to pass judgement on the affairs
of the world. This self-appointed little editor of reality is just an
impossible fiction that collapses the moment one examines it. This Cartesian
'Me' is a soft-ware reality, not a hardware reality'. This body on the left
and this body on the right are running variations of the same
program...(Lila p 204).

This last sentence sums it up for me. We are simply variations of the same
program and the whole 'program' consists of static patterns of value and so
are 'we'. These variations have come about through the different sets of
analogues we use to interpret Quality cognitively whilst the primary reality
is the same for all of us. And even our analogies are not, stricktly
speaking our own...they are all from these boxcars making up the train.
It seems to me, Willblake2, that we have built up a cult of the individual
which serves religious, socio/political and economic ends but as I have
tried to suggest a few times, the REAL differences between individuals are
negligible. We all drink from the mythos and have built society, gods,
dogma's, logic etc etc. Within a cult of individualsm you can blame the
other for all the things that go wrong endlessly dividing, slicing, cutting
up all that is whole and has been whole from the beginning. That is the mess
we are in and stay in because we do not assume any responsibility for it.
Taking responsibility for this yourself and not leave it up to your
neighbour, Obama, Hu Jintao or your mother-in law. It starts within your
heart, head and through your hands as a representative of these patterns of
quality.
I think the 'I', the unique 'I' does not exist.

I am interested in your views on this Willblake2 (following on from Bo, can
you change your name? This sounds like talking with a computer program!!)

Cheers
Andre
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to