gav said to Krimel: ...your thinking pressuposes SOM - senses responding to an external (system dependent) reality - that is *subject experiencing object*. this is as non-moq as it is possible to be.
Krimel replied: I have been through this a dozen times with your cult leader. I have no intention of rehashing this with someone who doesn't have the juice to keep up. dmb says: Hmmm. As I see it, Krimel, you have evaded this point a dozen times but have never once actually addressed it. You employ the presuppositions of SOM in your physiological descriptions of experience but have never examined them. Similarly, you've never really addressed the issue of reductionism either. These two mistakes are inter-related and are apparently so central in your thinking that questioning them, for you, is unthinkable. It seems that you don't understand the problem or even understand how it could be a problem. As a result, your responses are almost always completely irrelevant to the actual issues. And calling people names does not constitute an argument. Grown up people just roll their eyes at that sort of nonsense, which is only fitting. If you ever provided a relevant response to these criticisms, I must have missed it. Feel free to re-post your best shot at it, if you think there was a good one. _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage. http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009 Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
