[Krimel, on 7/5]:

I really don't have the patience to sort through all of your issues, Ham.
If Dave is stuck making arguments from the 1800s yours date from
circa 1300. More happened to change human consciousness in the
past century than in all of history before it. Regressing to the ideas of
centuries past will not help us move into the future.

Changes in human consciousness (perception?) may be for the better or the worse, but it isn't necessarily wisdom. Certainly if we do not learn from the past we lessen our understanding, but I am not one who believes that metaphysical insight becomes outmoded by the passing of time or evolutionary changes in society's worldview -- even if it's called "progressive". .

The only subjective experiences I can have are mine. I am the ONLY
subject from this metaphysical point of view. You are an object,
external to me and any speculation about your internal states is no less
external to me than speculation about the consciousness of a tree or
an iron filing.

No disagreement there.

The plural use of the word subject in SOM is unintelligible.

It's a dialectical inconvenience but not unintelligible, provided you have an ontogeny that accounts for multiplicity and diversity. The sensibility/otherness dichotomy of Essentialism is one such ontogeny.

I am not an academician but I do reject those terms as fit only for
fantasy and fiction. Speculation without the possibility of resolution
is just mental masturbation. Certainly philosophy includes a lot of that,
apparently you can get a degree in it from Colorado.

So you live in a place so befuddled by the Raygun revolution that
you can't even raise taxes to celebrate national holidays. That is sad.
If everyone in your town can afford HDTV's sufficient to make
watching fireworks meaningful, I would think you could jack your
millage rate a fraction of a percent and celebrate like real Americans.

Good point. I suppose I should to take this matter up with our local tax collector.
Meantime, I'm content to celebrate life without the pyrotechnics.

--Ham



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to