[Steve] > DQ as pre-intellectual makes sense from the empirical perspective > where time itself is not a given but derived from experience. From > this perspective ideas come first [Craig, previously] > This seems contradictory. If the empirical perspective is > “pre-intellectual”, then how can it be a perspective where > “ideas come first”? [Steve] > Ideas come first as in the dynamic/static split. They are the first > static patterns
Pirsig mentions carbon static patterns, which must preceed ideas by millions of years. Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
