[Steve] > DQ as pre-intellectual makes sense from the empirical perspective > where time itself is not a given but derived from experience. From > this perspective ideas come first [Craig, previously] > This seems contradictory. If the empirical perspective is > “pre-intellectual”, then how can it be a perspective where > “ideas come first”? [Steve] > Ideas come first as in the dynamic/static split. They are the first > static patterns Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
- Re: [MD] Reductionism craigerb
- Re: [MD] Reductionism X Acto
- Re: [MD] Reductionism Krimel
- [MD] Empirical and Historical craigerb
- [MD] Another paralleldavid craigerb
- [MD] Another parallel craigerb
- Re: [MD] Another parallel craigerb
- Re: [MD] Another parallel X Acto
- Re: [MD] Another parallel John Carl
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical Steve Peterson
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical craigerb
- [MD] Empirical and Historical craigerb
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical Steve Peterson
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical skutvik
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical X Acto
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical skutvik
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical X Acto
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical John Carl
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical craigerb
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical X Acto
- Re: [MD] Empirical and Historical Platt Holden
