> > >> > I don't understand the claims that metaphysics is unavoidable. Why must we > call "not seeing a way to privilege one metaphysical system above all other > possible views" itself a metaphysical view? Why not call this a > post-metaphysical perspective? >
Well a more accurate term would be "meta-metaphysical perspective". But some of us, not content with mere drinking and bar-girls, would want to get even more meta and insist that meta-meta-metaphysics is the only way to go. But there's really no need. Metaphysics covers the whole shebang. Yay metaphysics. John > > Best, > Steve > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
