All
30 Sep. Andre wrote:
Andre to Ron:
> The inorganic level is patterned according to the laws of physics, the
> organic level is patterned according to the laws of nature etc etc.
> this seems to me to be a participatory process of DQ/SQ not intellect
> 'on its own' (otherwise you'd get into an idealist frame n'est pas?).
John, muttering and grumbling]
> I don't see what's so wrong with an idealistic framework...
> Andre:
> John,the last thing I want you to do is mutter and grumble.
> What is wrong with the idealist framework? Nothing really, but the MoQ
> has, supposedly, done away with the 'it all springs from the mind/ it
> all springs from matter dichotomy.
In other words made the said ("springs from mind, springs from
matter") into its own intellectual level, thereby dissolving the paradoxes
while keeping the enormous value of the S/O distinction. I don't say:
"Finally one who understands the SOL", but "finally one who
UNDERSTANDS THE MOQ"!!! That goes for the rest of Andre's post.
All accusations of being a "dud" is declared nil and void :-).
Bodvar
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
