[Platt] Now comes the predictable ad hominem attack, the last refuge of a loser. One would expect better on a site devoted to Quality. But alas . . .
[Arlo] There was and is no "ad hominem" here, this is clearly just evasion. I simply pointed out you, once again, were not responding to ANY substantive point and simply using the Pee Wee device (calling me a "theist" in an argument where I've demonstrated your theism). I can see you desperation here, Platt, and I have to ask, would it not be better to try to learn something than play your ridiculous games of evasion? When, and if, you are ready to address just one of the substantive points I've been making, please let me know. You can start with this. ALL "patterns" are responses to Quality. That is what patterns "are"; stable value responses to Quality. Do you deny this? Can you tell me any pattern you feel is NOT the result of stable value preferences to Quality? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
