[Platt]
So we're still back at "Oops" -- suddenly from nothing patterns appeared and
started responding to DQ. A freaking miracle. Let us pray. 

[Arlo]
You can keep thumping that Pee Wee, Platt, but its just sad. And it makes you
look like a fool. And desperate. (Andre... see, what did I tell you, The Pee
Wees are really starting to fly!)

No. Patterns just didn't "suddenly from nothing appear and start responding to
DQ". If you bothered to read my last post, I've already said that. (Note: I
understand you did read my last email, and this is just a distortive rhetoric
trick. I'm used to that.) 

ALL patterns are responses to Quality. Are you actually saying here you think
there are patterns that are NOT responses to Quality??? Maybe you should
actually sit down and read Pirsig's books.

You are implying there are patterns (or the "first pattern") that is NOT a
response to DQ. I get why the theist in you can't quite understand this, and
why the reductionist is blind to it, but keep trying.

There are NO patterns that are not responses to DQ. ALL patterns appear as
responses to Quality. ALL of them. Every one. THAT IS WHAT PATTERNS ARE. How
can that be so hard for you to understand? 




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to