On 2/25/10 9:25 PM, "ARLO J BENSINGER JR" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> [Gav] the code of art is DQ/sq right? [Arlo] I'm going to have to think about this, but my inclination is "no". The code of art, or just "art", is IMO that which allows us to catch a fleeting glance of the indefinable Void (DQ). <snip> Hi Gav, Arlo and All, I question your use of ³the indefinable Void² with DQ in parenthesis. ³Indefinable² and ³void² do not have the same meaning. Rather than creating a greater emphasis for a meaning for DQ, when placed together they are ³nonsense² Of course a void is indefinable. By definition there is nothing in a void. Imho DQ is not nonsense. Joe > [Gav] > the code of art is DQ/sq right? > > [Arlo] > I'm going to have to think about this, but my inclination is "no". The code of > art, or just "art", is IMO that which allows us to catch a fleeting glance of > the indefinable Void (DQ). Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
