[Joseph] I question your use of ³the indefinable Void² with DQ in parenthesis. ³Indefinable² and ³void² do not have the same meaning.
[Arlo] The indefinable is what creates the Void in symbolic representations. I'm not talking about a big, black hole in space. If the term troubles you, drop it, "The code of art, or just "art", is IMO that which allows us to catch a fleeting glance of the indefinable (DQ)." [Joseph] Rather than creating a greater emphasis for a meaning for DQ, when placed together they are ³nonsense² . [Arlo] I don't think so. I think it creates a very salient metaphor. Like the "void" in Magritte's "False Mirror". [Jospeh] By definition there is nothing in a void. [Arlo] Alright, I'm not gonna get into a big literal/metaphorical argument here. As I said, I wasn't referring to a vacant area of space, but to the everpresent "Void" in the semantic web of our symbolically-mediated activity; that which symbols can only point to, but never capture. [Joseph] Imho DQ as evolution is not nonsense. [Arlo] ?? Um. Okay. No one said it was. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
