I think it is proper to talk of Ultimate Truth rather than the Absolute, but, and I could be misunderstanding, Ultimate Truth is not separate from conventional truths. Kind of like sq and DQ are interdependent.
On Mar 4, 2010, at 12:20 AM, John Carl wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:18 AM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I believe Pirsig would agree with W. James and Nagarjuna. > > > > As would Royce and me, Ron. Our case for an absolute is also the middle way > - it's not the only thing there is, but neither is it non-existent. And as > an existant, it pulls that moral compass toward better and better analogy. > > > > John > > ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
