Hi Ham
I think that Steve gave a very good answer to your question:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/2010-March/046553.html
and said it much better than I would.
Cheers
Horse
On 03/04/2010 05:57, Ham Priday wrote:
Horse, with a query to Bo --
Okay, sorry I mistook Bo's statement for one of yours. I'll let him
explain the meaning of his phrasing in this quote of 4/1:
FYI: The SOL does NOT say that the 4th level consists of
subjects and objects, rather it is the SOM (the "objective-
over-subject" approach) without its "M"!!!!
I can understand SOM "without its 'M'", but not the
"objective-over-subject" bias attributed to this dichotomy. Is it the
SOM (objectivist) view that objects "dominate" subjects?
And, Horse, I believe you did say this to Bo on 4/2:
But your main contention has always been that the Intellectual level
of the MoQ is Subject Object Metaphysics i.e. a metaphysical position
that posits
Subjects and Objects as the basis of reality.
My question concerns the reference by you and others in this forum to
the "metaphysical position" of the subject/object relationship.
Specifically, what is metaphysical about it?
I'd still appreciate your slant on why Pirsig chose to posit objective
reality (experienced subjectively) as a metaphysical concept.
Thanks, Horse.
--Ham
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
--
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an
attractive and well preserved body, but to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine
in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what
a ride!"... Hunter S Thompson
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
