On Apr 25, 2010, at 5:25 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Marsha to Andre: > > Have you ever contemplated the nature of what the > Buddhist call conventional/relative reality, or truths? > > Andre: > Hi Marsha, > Am really not sure what you are wanting me to say or what you are > driving at. The 'nature' of conventional reality is the static perspective > (as far as I can explain).It seeks to 'reveal' Quality though is not the > same as Quality. > > But I think you mean something else? > > Kind regards > Andre
Hi Andre, At first it seemed easy to go from thinking about myself and objects as independent entities to value patterns; it made good sense. But I kept thinking about it until it became a bit of an earthquake, and I'm still feeling aftershocks, some of them quite strong. It's that static truths are empty of independent existence, and after that statement what is, useful or not, actually left over. The results: Ho hum to neutrinos (not really, but kind of). Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
