Greetings Andre,
Have you ever contemplated the nature of static patterns? Not their name and designation, but their nature? Marsha On Apr 24, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Hi to all you weak minded, > > Another thing just occurred to me: ZMM is a reminder of what we have lost. I > remember, in ZMM Phaedrus talks about and reflects on the little patches of > grass in front of people's homes. He'd rather they were not there because > they remind him of what has been lost...the addition to those contributing > factors of disconnection and isolation from (our) nature. > > Find ourselves in technology? In motorcycle maintenance? > > Yes. We need to. This points to evolutionary adaptation. But we cannot deny > our in/organic patterns. As the MOQ states: 'What is the purpose of all this > intellectual knowledge? And the answer is unequivocal: To dynamically improve > and preserve society ( and what is society founded upon?). And I would > emphasise the 'improve' bit. ( e.g ridding itself of religious crap and so > called scientific 'objective' crap...both spheres within which the > political/economic system is hopelessly lost). > > This entire idea of 'opposition' and 'dominance' of one level over another > needs to be seen within the MOQ context and not the SOM context. This makes > one hell of a difference with regards to how you give expression to this. SOM > has this eternal 'opposition' whilst the MOQ talks about blending/ > controlling/binding-within-mutual understanding, not forgetting your parents, > not endangering the static in favour of the dynamic, or not allowing the > dynamic in favour of (degenerating) the static, etc etc. By the way, this has > little to do with not speaking the same language... it has to do with > 'understanding' from a higher evolutionary perspective. > > The MOQ has provided us with the basis of this understanding and suggested a > guiding principle 'as old as the world'. > > Anyway, I just wanted to suggest a 'return to the roots' as it were, which I > found in ZMM and which was worked out in some detail in LILA. > > Ps: reality is a usefull, conventional concept. There a two perspectives. > DQ/SQ.The one is statically 'lived' the other is dynamically 'experienced'. > Need we know more? And what is good Phaedrus...? > ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
