horse pattern:
Let's take, for instance, the pattern: horse. I understand horse to be a biological static pattern of value. It's also best for me to understand it as opposite-of-non-horse. By doing so I allow for many individual's history of the pattern. If one individual's exposure to horse has been only through books(words & pictures) it will be a limited pattern. Another individual's exposure to horse may include growing up on a horse ranch and it will be a much broader/deeper pattern which most likely will contain smell and once bitten by a horse. All aspects are conceptual whether then are thoughts, sights, smell, sounds, tastes, touch. Concepts held in consciousness, whatever that may be. Marsha On Apr 30, 2010, at 6:34 AM, Horse wrote: > Precisely Marsha > Do you now see the problems that are the consequence of seeing SOM as the > intellectual level. > It destroys the beauty and harmony of the MoQ. Pirsigs work is mangled almost > beyond recognition. > Intellectual patterns of value are the Intellectual level and vice versa. Not > SOM. If you go down that path then there are some serious consequences. > I'll get back to Platt later on today as I have a fairly packed day going > through someone else's remix of one of my more complex songs. > Who the hell said being unemployed was a life of leisure!! > > On 30/04/2010 09:43, MarshaV wrote: >> Platt& Bo, >> >> Now you two have me confused. I understand it to be that >> the Social Level is made of social-spovs, and the Intellectual >> (SOM) Level is made up of intellectual-spovs, and the Biological >> Level was made up of biological-spovs, etc., and that ALL >> patterns are conceptual. >> >> Wow! What a mess. >> >> >> Marsha >> Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
