Hi John, > Hi Mary, > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Mary <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > [Mary Replies] > > Exactly! The definition of the Intellectual Level, though, is > essential to > > understanding the MoQ. I don't think it's possible to grasp the > enormity > > of > > the implications inherent in a worldview of Value while clinging to > the > > notion that the Intellectual Level is more than SOM. > > > > > And I'm afraid you're all going to continue to go around and > around in > loopy circles, clinging to the notion that the 4th level is nothing > more > than intellect. > > Happy Circling! > [Mary Replies] Thank you!
Based on another post of yours today, I guess you and Ham can enjoy chatting about "absolute" DQ too, and oh yeah, absolute TRUTH while you're about it. That should keep you entertained while you wait for us to sort out these other topics. You see, DQ is undefined for a reason. Once defined, it immediately becomes "absolute". Absolutes are death to Quality. But I guess you don't see that since you're still a closet Christian. The MoQ sheep's clothing isn't fitting you very well. Your need for a "Creator" - an absolute source - is showing. Oops! Best, Mary Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
