It has been understood for quite some time that experience
or "be-ing" is varied,many, dynamic and in flux.
And in hindsight we must ask ourselves if the idea
of "being" as equivalent to "one" has bore fruitful
consequences.
The school of thought in the west from the Pythagoreans
to the Platonist to the Aristotelian empiricists take
"be-ing" as "one" whole unit.
The Platonists and Pythagoreans conceived of it as
a primary being of the universe, while the Aristotelian
understood it as predication of meaning. What it meant
when we say that something "is" in terms of definition.
The discussions revolving around this issue are many
and varied.
But the question that is avoided is not whether or not
the idea of "being as one" is technologically superior
but rather is "being as one" better evolutionarily
than "being as in flux" and dynamic.
Is this technological superiority better evolutionarily?
This would be a great place to begin the discussion.
-Ron
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
