OOPs, you're conflating again Frank. better check your depends. On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Frank Booth <[email protected]> wrote:
> <F> > WRONG! > > 1) Morality is a social pattern and therefore intellectual patterns cannot > have > morality as an attribute. > Social patterns don't have morality as an attribute either. They are driven by morality, they model upon it, but morality certainly isn't social. I assumed you'd read the books? Therein you'll find that the universe as a moral order is a high Quality idea. Morality as derived from the social order is how the Victorians viewed it. We don't sing that song in these parts. > > 2) Society is the sum total ( pattern ) of many individual social patterns. > > 3) Nevertheless ( in spite of [1] and [2] ), MOQ asserts that evolution is > a > moral process. > > I don't like "in spite of". in spite of's are nasty ans spiteful sounding. They usually indicate a kludge. Let's just stick with - Evolution is a moral process. Or rather, thee moral process. Society is _a_ moral process. > And so on ... > > > Exactly. John the moral process Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
