On Sep 19, 2010, at 11:18 AM, [email protected] wrote: > On 19 Sep 2010 at 10:20, MarshaV wrote: > > > Ron, Andre, Adrie, (Ronettes), > > I am finished with this for now, and will stick > to my own definition/interpretation as a more > meaningful description of intellectual > static patterns of value. More meaningful > for me, which is appropriate to my own > experience. > > Hi Marsha, > > Funny thing happened on the way to defining the intellectual level. Almost > everyone agrees, including Pirsig, that intellectual patterns originate out > of > society. The same people then try to squeeze the MOQ into the intellectual > level, but what society did the MOQ originate from? None. > > The MOQ originated in response to Dynamic qualty by the unique combination of > value patterns named Robert M. Pirsig. Some may try to say he is society. > Yeah, > right. He is no more society than the brujo was. The values that matter, the > ones that change society, originate out of individuals, defined as being all > four static value levels plus the ability to respond to DQ. > > An argument will be that Pirsig, the brujo and other innovators originate out > of society. True enough. But new value patterns originate from individuals > only. That's why Pirsig wrote that you shouldn't execute criminals unless > they > are a threat to society. One of them might have an idea that would move the > evolution of life forward. > > In fact when you think about it, individuals don't fit in any of the levels. > They're a separate category all their own. > > Platt
Hi Platt, Certainly dynamic individuals like Mr. Pirsig are a separate category. I agree, I agree, I agree. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
