[Marsha to Platt] Certainly dynamic individuals like Mr. Pirsig are a separate category. I agree, I agree, I agree.
[Arlo] Human individuals are a composition of the four levels of value patterns. They are not a "separate category", whatever that means. [Platt] The MOQ originated in response to Dynamic qualty by the unique combination of value patterns named Robert M. Pirsig. [Arlo] The MOQ originated out of a shared cultural milieu, involving the specific historical-social patterns that made the dialogue possible. These include (but are not limited to) Chris, Kant, the faculty at Montana and Chicago, Poincare, Einstein, Sidis, etc. They include those who made the storage and transmissions of encoded ideas possible, the transit structures that allowed Pirsig to travel from place to place. The MOQ originated out this social reality, it would not have been possible without it. As always, you are falsely seeing "individuals" are "social activity" as oppositional forces. Instead, when one sees Pirsig as an "individual acting within a social context" one sees that Pirsig appraisal that intellectual pattern emerge from social pattern not biology is a better one than you are offering in response. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
