The only way I can see humans as "a separate category" Platt, is to
aknowledge that only humans have intellect.  They are also the most
supremely social of all the animals.

But if you're trying to make the point that humans stand outside the four
categories, I sure can't go there.  And I'm  an MoQ heretic?


John

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:59 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 19 Sep 2010 at 13:15, MarshaV wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 19, 2010, at 12:40 PM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:
>
> > [Marsha to Platt]
> > Certainly dynamic individuals like Mr. Pirsig are a separate category.  I
> > agree, I agree, I agree.
> >
> > [Arlo]
> > Human individuals are a composition of the four levels of value patterns.
> They
> > are not a "separate category", whatever that means.
>
> Marsha:
> I was speaking using conventional language.   I didn't mean to confuse you.
>
> Platt
> Human individuals are composites of the four levels of  static value
> patterns
> plus ability to respond to DQ. The static intellectual level doesn't have
> that
> ability. That's why individuals are a separate category. They are the
> shakers
> and movers of the evolution of life.
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to