Is the measurement, observation, overlaying a pattern? Great book!
On Sep 22, 2010, at 3:11 AM, MarshaV wrote:
>
>
> "We seem to be saying that somehow observing an atom being at a particular
> place created its being there. Yes! We warned you that we'd be saying
> something hard to believe.
> ...
>
> "We've been talking about an atom because quantum theory was developed to
> deal with microscopic objects. Later we'll just talk of "objects," because
> in principle, quantum theory applies to everything and has been demonstrated
> for objects much larger than atoms. Quantum theory has been used to address
> entities as large as the universe and as intimate as the mind. At this point
> if you're mystified by quantum mechanics, you join experts."
>
> "We now display the archetypal quantum experiment that _demonstrates_ what
> we've been saying. Or, in the words of Pascual Jordan, a developer of
> quantum theory, we demonstrate that "Observations not only _disturb_ what is
> to be measured, they _produce_ it.""
>
>
>> (Rosenblum & Kuttner,'Quantum Enigma: Physics Encounters Consciousness',
>> p.77,2006)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
