"Students come into physics to study the down-to-earth physical world.  The 
_Oxford English Dictionary_ defines this sense of "physical" well:  "Of or 
pertaining to material nature, as _opposed to the psychical, mental or 
spiritual"_ (emphasis added).  The 'New York Times' recently quoted science 
historian Jed Buchwald:  "Physicists . . . have long had a special loathing for 
admitting questions with the slightest emotional content into their 
professional work."  Indeed, most physicists want to avoid dealing with that 
skeleton in our closet, the role of the conscious observer.  The Copenhagen 
interpretation of quantum mechanics allows that avoidance.  It's our 
discipline's "orthodox" position."

>>>>  (Rosenblum & Kuttner,'Quantum Enigma: Physics Encounters Consciousness', 
>>>> p.99,2006)       



   "Classical probability in the shell game, say, is the _subjective_ 
probability (for you) of where the pea is.  But there is also a real pea under 
one shell or the other.  Quantum probability is _not_ the probability of where 
the atom is.  It's the objective probability of where you (or anyone) will 
_find_ it.  The atom wasn't in that box until it was observed to be there. 

   "Quantum theory has not atom in addition to the wavefunctiion of the atom.  
Since the atom's wavefunction occupies both boxes, the atom itself is 
simultaneously in both boxes until its observation in a single box _causes_  it 
to be wholly in that box

   "The point of the last paragraph is hard to accept.  That's why we keep 
repeating it.  (Forgive us.)  Even students completing a course in quantum 
mechanics, when asked what the wavefunction tells, often incorrectly respond 
that it gives the probability of where the object is.  The text we teach from 
emphasizes the correct point by quoting Pascual Jordan, one of the founders of 
quantum theory:  "Observations not only disturb what is to be measured, they 
_produce_ it."  But we're sympathetic with our students.  Using quantum 
mechanics is hard enough without worrying about what it means."



>>>>  (Rosenblum & Kuttner,'Quantum Enigma: Physics Encounters Consciousness', 
>>>> p.103,2006)       
>> 


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to