Hi Platt, On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:45 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > >> Platt: >> "Patterns" bother me. They presume subjects looking at ordered objects. Even >> "experience" suggests the S/O division. Instead I would like to see >> "valuing" >> substituted for "experience," "consciousness," "awareness" and "perception." >> -- >> valuing Dynamically (creatively) or statically (predictably). Then the world >> of >> things become static values and the act of painting becomes Dynamic.value >> creation, motivated by betterness. > > Marsha: > 'Subjects looking' is a patterned way of thinking. No such thing; only > static > patterns of value moving through a field of DQ. The value is held together > by repetition through time and across individuals. At least that 's how I > understand. Lila is an accumulation of ever-changing patterns intersecting > with DQ. > > Platt: > I don't think "patterns" add anything. In fact, they obscure the value > universe. Why not just say, "No such thing, only static values moving through > a > field of DQ." And, "Lila is an accumulation of ever-changing static values > intersecting with DQ." Does inserting "patterns" add anything? Marsha: The word 'pattern' represents repetition which gives strength and duration to static value, and the word adds something ascetic. The phrase 'static pattern of value' is poetic. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
