On 23 Oct 2010 at 1:02, Horse wrote: For the last 10+ years Platt you've been telling me that socialism and communism are the same thing. So are you now trying to tell us that, in reality, the Nazi's were communists? You've been arguing for years that words don't mean what they mean by doing exactly this. Please explain how the Nazi's were communists.
Socialists, communists, fascists, statists, liberals, progressives and the like all seek similar means to the same end -- heaven on earth by government taking responsibility for all aspects of life and imposing uniformity of thought and action by force. Nazism, like communism et al, is a religion of the state. The conflicts between Nazis and communists (and why some think they are different) were battles for power, not ultimate goals. Platt Horse On 23/10/2010 00:01, [email protected] wrote: > Q: What does NAZI stand for? > > A. It is short nickname for Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei > (National Socialist German Workers' Party). > > Source: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_Nazi_stand_for > > Nonsense? I hope you're not going to argue like DMB that words don't mean what > they mean. > > > On 22 Oct 2010 at 22:21, Horse wrote: > > Nice bit of twisting Plat - complete nonsense though. > The Nazi's were fascists, not socialists, as you know full well along > with the Italian and Spanish fascists and the Mosleyite fascists in the UK. > > Horse > > On 22/10/2010 20:23, Platt Holden wrote: >> Do you find it suggestive that the socialist party in charge in Germany >> during WWII was mainly composed of "authoritative personalities"? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
