Hi Andre, I do not have the Ph.D. If this provides definitions which differentiate the two, then I would be happy to hear them. As Ham presents Value, I equate it to my understanding of Quality. This understanding has been formed over, and withstood 35 years of questioning. May I ask you how long you have been contemplating Quality?
If there is a well defined concept of Value and Quality which is present in Anthony's Ph.D. could you please summarize it. I am more than happy to abide by accepted definitions. Often in the field of science two Ph.D.s can be accepted which arrive at opposing conclusions. I have presided over the defense of such thesis. Both are arrived at through interpretation of the same data. Perhaps you do not know this, and believe science to only point in one direction all the time. There is a lot of disagreement in the fields of science, this does not mean that half the scientists are wrong. They all follow the same methods. More often than not, both sides are wrong or incomplete. Such is the messy business of science. Thanks, Mark On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]>wrote: > Mark to Ham: > > Value, Quality all the same thing. > > Andre: > This is just one more instance of your superficial understanding of the MOQ > Mark. In the MOQ value and Quality are not the same 'thing'.See Anthony's > PhD, sections 2.2 and 2.3. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
