Hi Andre, I agree with your post below. As such, it is a series of words. Understanding of such words requires questioning or challenging as you say. I present such a challenge. What is left when such things are out the door, as you say?
Mark On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]>wrote: > Mark to dmb: > > I have tried previously to provide a way out of SOM. The method is to try > to identify the subjective itself, the true subjective. > > Andre: > The way out of SOM is to challenge and annihilate the assumptions upon > which it is based. The MOQ has done this. It places Quality, experience, as > the fundamental ingredient upon the building of an idea of reality and > within this process all ideas of subject, object, subjectivism and > objectivism are out the door. > It shares this with Buddhism by claiming that these concepts are indeed > 'empty' ( in MOQ terms 'figures of speech'), intellectual constructions > necessary to maintain SOM. > > All is re-designated as patterns of value within the MOQ and this is a > major step forward. > > Pirsig wrote eighty years after James, but reading James really gives you > the foundations upon which Mr. Pirsig built his metaphysics. It really > drives home the basics with which James was grappling and which resulted in > his pragmatic and radical empiricist attitudes. ( as well as F.S.C Northrop > of course). > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
