Mark to Andre:

Forgive me for being provocative.  My questions and statements are met with
what you write below.  "You don't understand, read more".  That leads me to
understand that you don't understand.  It is quite possible to respond to my
queries without being condescending.

Andre:
Curious this; labeling someone's contributions as lacking 'depth' is not 
condescending but 'provocative'? I realize English is my second language but 
this I find a strange summing up and conclusion.
Yes, I can respond to your 'queries' but reading your posts makes me wonder 
where to start? A simple query such as: 'What puts DQ out of the bounds of 
metaphysics?' leads me to indeed say:'You don't understand'. I mean, ZMM, LILA, 
LC, etc are full of why DQ should be kept out of any conceptualizations of it. 
You can't get at it that way. And if you don't get that you don't get it. Get 
it?

Mark:
Please provide the Tenants of MOQ in short form,...

Andre:
There is a good summary of the MOQ by Mr. Pirsig on MOQ.org (I Think).

Mark:
I do not have the Ph.D.  If this provides definitions which differentiate
the two, then I would be happy to hear them.  As Ham presents Value, I
equate it to my understanding of Quality.

Andre:
If you want a copy just ask, but do not expect too many definitions. I know 
that definitions are easy but they are also easy to endlessly argue about. The 
MOQ is a little bit more subtle than that. But I could be wrong.
As for Ham presenting Value. Ham does not subscribe to the MOQ.

I am not running away from what you are asking Mark, but, at the risk of getting a 
"well, that's your interpretation' simply refer you to original sources. We 
could take the discussion from there.

Mark:
May I ask you how long you have been contemplating Quality?

Andre:
I told you what I did as a four year old. Now that was Quality...the older the 
hanky the better!!!  ;-)
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to