sorry, I don't read ahead but just scan down and deal with it, one at a time...
I correct my correction in light of your correction. John On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:02 PM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sorry, I meant that last one for john, > > > ________________________________ > > John: > My particular point, furthermore, is that intellect cannot be the highest > aspiration of evolutionary development. The dictionary definition of > intellect, is non-artistic, for one thing. It refers to a specific branch > of human cognition that operates rationally by rules and analysis. Not at > all adequate for a label for the 4th level, imo. > > > Ron: > I think once the good was reflected apon, intellectually, intellect > becomes a force for evolution. > I think the understanding of the term used for the fourth level > is anchored in the understanding of the expansion of rationality. > Analytics is an aestetic, a > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
