[Mark]
Divining does not require theism.
[Arlo]
I took your use of "divining" to be mocking of DMB. Wasn't it?
[Mark]
Pirsig's ideas as you state seem to leave an interpretation of DQ up to us.
[Arlo]
Right, and your "interpretation of DQ" is YOUR metaphysics. But
you've slyly switched gears here, and given that you cheer Marsha
this does not surprise me.
[Mark]
As such, we are discussing who's interpretation has more quality,
again a personal stance.
[Arlo]
We are discussing whose ideas have more quality, and to do that we
need an understanding of what has been said, and what is being said
in response.
As I said, my thoughts about non-humans on the social level is NOT an
interpretation of Pirsig, it is a refutation of Pirsig.
Certainly you can tell the difference.
But yes, we are arguing whose ideas have more value, in Marsha's case
its her ideas about Intellect=SOM versus Pirsig's ideas that
Intellect!=SOM (that's programming code for "does not equal" for the
laypeople).
Or in my case its about my ideas that Social=Non-humans versus
Pirsig's ideas that Social=Humans.
But your last reply to Marsha really shows you are not interested in
any conversation about this with me, as you ignored nearly everything
I said and chose a path of unbased ridicule instead. Sad.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
