Hi Tim, On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:28 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> [Tim] > In a post a few days ago I looked up Sidis' 'the animate and the > inanimate'. I gave it a quick read because I couldn't put it down. > Then I looked back at something - I don't remember where I got turned on > to it, I think it was here, someone provided a link maybe ... Anyway, I > ended up coming upon 'entropic gravity'. Are you familiar with these? > Any thoughts? > [Mark] I have not read Sidis' book yet. I looked for it in the library, but was not surprised that they did not have it. My memory of entropic gravity was that it was a thermodynamic approach to describing gravity. This would be a systems approach describing gravity as a result rather than as a creator. I would imagine that the math is one which postulates that gravity does not cause interaction, but is a result of something else. We come across many concepts like this. It is like a coin having two sides, one cannot exist without the other. A similar notion is whether we create or are created. The synthesis of these are what I consider the middle way. Let's assume both and balance them. Yin and Yang, the ever-present act of balancing. Things are not found in the extremes. Cheers, Mark > -- > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
