On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:49 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Marsha, >> Greetings Tim, >> >> I would think that heart in connection with DQ would be beyond all >> static patterned boundaries. Yet as DQ is always present whether it >> is, to a greater or lesser degree, acknowledged. >> >> The definition and connotations of the word 'heart' have me at the >> moment stumped, but regardless, it instinctually seems a good direction. >> There is that awesome experience of having your "heart" expand... >> >> heart=biological >> spirit=subjective >> >> ??? >> >> Marsha > > > [Tim] > I'm not sure exactly why you brought 'heart' into this conversation. If > you want it to be 'biological' I can start to understand it from that > perspective for you. Perhaps I shouldn't have submitted to the term > 'hearts and minds' either...? Anyway, what I had been referring to was > something else. Something along the lines of the 'romantic' maybe. A > different kind of 'intellect' (as in intellectual level) from purely > rational. In fact, 'purely rational' may not ever be properly > meaningful; what passes for it now, language (including math), always > involves a 'starting in the middle'. > > I'm not sure what you were getting at in equating spirit to subjective. > > Tim > --
Greetings, I don't know much myself, but here heart is discussed much better than any of my words: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bf6D5T-EVw Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
