For your information , Andre.(in regard of what David and you are trying to
explain)

http://robertpirsig.org/Pragmatism.htm

Some quality snips( out of context)
DEAN SUMMERS document.

Under introduction-
Undoubtedly Pirsig's texts are unique in their synthesis of the forms of
fiction, autobiography, travelogue, chautauqua, ‘how to’ manual and
philosophy amongst others. However the agreement that they are unique seems
also to serve to identify the texts as cultish and to thereby contain and
remove Pirsig's philosophy from mainstream philosophical consideration. This
is quite probably a mistake at the expense of contemporary philosophy. In
this study we will try to show that Pirsig presents not only a coherent and
tenable theory, but that he has made a significant contribution to American
pragmatism. We will ignore the unique form of his work in order to focus on
the relevance and importance that his concepts might have for the mainstream
philosophical discourse

and further..
To give Pirsig his fair trial then we will be analysing his philosophy in
terms of the pragmatism of Peirce, James and Dewey. Regarding Pirsig we will
be necessarily reductionist, considering only the essentially philosophical
aspects of his texts and ignoring all other aspects. Regarding the founders
of pragmatism, we will be necessarily selective - we will select from their
rigorous and extensive arguments in order to support, clarify and achieve
the fullest possible exposition of Pirsig's rather sketchier arguments. The
crucial point of this is that Pirsig offers a significant development of
pragmatism. If it were simply that he agrees with or is in line with the
pragmatists, then Pirsig's philosophizing might be of little interest to us.
The importance of his work is that his specific concept of Quality is an
original and valuable development of American pragmatic philosophy.

Further..
The Metaphysics of Quality is a continuation of the mainstream of
twentieth-century American philosophy. It is a form of pragmatism, of
instrumentalism. (Pirsig, 1991, 373) These claims, which seem to involve
only the central concepts of his and James' positions, are quite specific.
We will address them in this study but our aim is also to make a wider
comparison than Pirsig has done - wider in the sense that it extends to
Peirce and Dewey too, and wider in the sense that we will consider the full
extent of Pirsig's position, including the general motives and the
criticisms of other philosophies which he shares with the founders of
pragmatism. It is hoped that in doing so we might initiate a revised
understanding of Pirsig's unique inquiries into values and morals, and that
we might indicate further areas of Pirsig's philosophy which require
necessary critical analysis.

Under Quality and reality-

It seems from this outlining of a connection that the pragmatists arguments
not only agree with Pirsig's but can also reinforce it. Furthermore Pirsig's
concept of dynamic quality is seen to be a development of Peirce's
metaphysical inquiries. It seems that Pirsig has given a name to that which
Peirce all but names himself - quality. Turning to James' idea of reality we
see that the connection is equally strong. We can agree with him that he is
a pluralist but still identify his metaphysics as monistic. James' pluralism
covers his concept of truth and meaning, but does not extend to his concept
of reality. He conceives of reality as “neutral stuff” , neither mind nor
matter, which can only be described as flux. Again, we can understand this
to mean ‘that which is without essential qualities, something which is
no-fixed-thing - in short - dynamic. And as we have argued, the only
candidate (except nothingness, which we have discounted) for this flux is
Pirsig's ‘quality.’ Only quality can be qualityless and thus dynamic or
'flux' in James' terms. There is no obvious difference between Pirsig's
monism – dynamic quality - and James' “neutral stuff.” For James the
separation of this neutral stuff into mind and matter is a later conscious
addition to the prior experience. This is the central point of James'
doctrine of immediate perception - that there is no separation of subject
and object, of knower and known at the moment of experiencing. James calls
the neutral stuff of reality “pure experience” (James, 1912, 93) – Pure
experience is the name which I gave to the immediate flux of life which
furnishes the material to our later reflection with its conceptual
categories. (James, 1912, 93)
Furthermore..

The past exists only in our memories, the future only in our plans. The
present is our only reality. The tree that you are aware of intellectually,
because of that small time lag, is always in the past and therefore is
always unreal. Any intellectually conceived object is always in the past and
therefore unreal. Reality is always the moment of vision before the
intellectualization takes place. There is no other reality. This
pre-intellectual reality is what he had identified as Quality. Since all
intellectually identifiable things must emerge from this pre-intellectual
reality, Quality is the parent, the source of all subjects and objects.
(Pirsig, 1974, 249-250)  Here Pirsig inverts the relationship of quality,
subject and object. In what he calls a “Copernican inversion” (Pirsig, 1974,
249) the dualistic picture in which the experience of quality is the product
of the relationship of subject and object is reversed so that the concepts
of subject and object arise out of the experience of quality. Subjects and
objects are part of the material which, in James' terms, pure experience
furnishes our later conceptual categories.

At this point we can now examine Pirsig's claim that his Metaphysics of
Quality seems to unite (James') pragmatism and radical empiricism into a
single fabric. (Pirsig, 1991, 372)
Pirsig takes the central theses of James' two philosophical systems, which
he was unable to unite satisfactorily himself, and finds that the concept of
quality makes that unification possible. Quality, or value, is the pragmatic
test of truth - and this is the essence of any form of Pragmatism (we will
discuss truth in chapter 2). The significance of Pirsig's theory is that he
also demonstrates that quality or value is the primary empirical experience,
in other words - that it is reality itself. Radical empiricism stated the
doctrine of immediate perception - that in experience the knower and the
known are not distinct, not separate, which Pirsig also maintains. He adds
to this that experience is value. Thus it is experience (which is value),
and not correspondence to the objective world (of knowledge) which is the
test of truth. A statement is true only if it is valuable...if it is good,
and we evaluate the statement on the basis of experience. Since quality is
reality in Pirsig's system, the ultimate guarantee of truth and meaning is
reality itself. He has developed a pragmatic conception in which pure
experience, reality and value are one and the same thing, thereby dissolving
the problem which plagued James' pragmatism - that the test of truth -
satisfaction - is entirely subjective.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(The past exists only in our memories, the future only in our plans. The
present is our only reality.) =>John Wheeler's dictum, present in both books
sometimes hidden in the formulation, still used today in quantum physiks.(my
comment)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Under knowledge and truth (most important)

Despite such statements though James' critics level their heaviest attacks
at this conception of facts, in which truth is determined by subjective
interests, and which is thus in constant danger of sliding into relativism.
Pirsig however prevents that slide. He offers a conception of truth in which
facts are pre-selected not on the basis of a relation of utility with our
interests, but on the basis of their quality - which is reality. A valuable
fact is one that agrees with experience. Since experience is of reality, the
test of the truth of a fact is, ultimately, reality. The problem that drives
Pirsig to this position is, in the first instance, his recognition of the
paradox involved in science's claim of objectivity. “Which facts are you
going to observe?” he asks, “There is an infinity of them.” (Pirsig, 197,
267) Pirsig derives this question from Poincaré in whom he sees a direct
continuity of ideas with his own. This particular point is generated by
Poincaré’s proof of the infinity of mechanical models that can explain any
given phenomenon - see Pirsig, 1974, pp263-272. But Pirsig was independently
aware of this problem before reading Poincaré - see Pirsig, 1974, 117).

Under conclusions-
"Perhaps though the most important thing, the ultimate demonstration of
Pirsig's pragmatism is that his philosophy grounds out in everyday
action...in everyday life. Like the founders of pragmatism Pirsig shows
above all that there is a demonstrable reason why that which we feel is
good, is good. Experience is not subjective, it is of the good, therefore
the moral good issues directly from reality. Pragmatism breaks the picture
in which knowledge is somehow ‘higher’ than experience and action. It does
this by showing that knowledge is actually a form of action which is guided
by experience. Pirsig's contribution has been to show that that experience
is of an absolutely real good. Furthermore, the moral theory that this gives
rise to is an extremely interesting one. It is perhaps the most dramatic
advance that he makes upon pragmatism, which is itself, for most critics,
above all a moral philosophy. If for this reason alone, Pirsig's philosophy
deserves to be re-evaluated in order to generate further analysis of its
concepts."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pirsig himself in Lila's Child.
104. In the MOQ, and in William James’ pragmatism, truth is
described as high quality intellectual patterns.

"LILA"

But the Metaphysics of Quality also says that Dynamic Quality-the
value-force that chooses an elegant mathematical solution to a laborious
one, or a brilliant experiment over a confusing, inconclusive one-is
another matter altogether. Dynamic Quality is a higher moral order than
static scientific truth, and it is as immoral for philosophers of science
to try to suppress Dynamic Quality as it is for church authorities to
suppress scientific method. Dynamic value is an integral part of science.
It is the cutting edge of scientific progress itself.
Anyway, all this certainly answered the question of whether the Metaphysics
of Quality was a foreign, cultish, deviant way of looking at things. The
Metaphysics of Quality is a continuation of the mainstream of twentieth
century American philosophy. It is a form of pragmatism, of
instrumentalism, which says the test of the true is the good. It adds that
this good is not a social code or some intellectualized Hegelian Absolute.
It is direct everyday experience. Through this identification of pure
value with pure experience, the Metaphysics of Quality paves the way for an
enlarged way of looking at experience which can resolve all sorts of
anomalies that traditional empiricism has not been able to cope with.
Phædrus supposed he could read on into all this James material but he
doubted that he would find anything different from what he had already
found.

Have to go now, have fun with Dean Summers



2011/3/7 Andre Broersen <[email protected]>

> Marsha to dmb:
>
>
> Maybe you need a reading lesson, because there was no mention in the RMP
> quote of 'American pragmatism' being an exception.
>
> Andre:
> Seems to me that you are being obstinately difficult and cantankerous
> Marsha. Dmb has provided you (in six posts) with clarifications based on
> sound rhetoric which neatly tie together and (should) dissolve your concern,
> which, if I remember correctly is that Pirsig's MOQ be 'confined' to the
> Jamesian tradition.
>
> When Pirsig says that his MOQ 'adds to James' pragmatism and his radical
> empiricism...the idea that the primal reality from which subjects and
> objects spring is value' is he thereby 'confining' it to this tradition? I
> suggest NO! Quite the opposite!
>
> As Pirsig says in his introduction to Anthony's PhD: His[Anthony'] purpose
> 'is to permanently enlarge and improve understanding at the most general
> levels of philosophic comprehension'. Is the MOQ thereby 'confined' to those
> general levels? I suggest its opposite.
>
> Phaedrus has taken on the entire Western philosophical tradition dating
> back to pre-Plato times by 'following a path that to his knowledge had never
> been taken before in the history of Western thought',...(ZMM, p 231). Does
> that mean that it is 'confined' to Western thought?
>
> Anthony calls the MOQ 'one of the first indigenous forms of Zen Buddhism to
> appear in the United States' Is the MOQ thereby 'confined' to Zen Buddhism?
>
> Or are you suggesting that Pirsig's MOQ arose out of a vacuum, with no
> 'foundation' of tradition anywhere? Then I would suggest you re-read Pirsigs
> amendment to the Cartesian statement.
>
> 'The Metaphysics of Quality resolves the relationship between intellect and
> society, subject and object, mind and matter, by embedding all of them in a
> larger system of understanding'.(LILA, p 305)
>
> To comprehend the 'embedding' you must have something to 'embed' no? Dmb
> (and Pirsig) has adequately shown which traditions are contrary and which
> traditions show similarities. Reading both in the light of ZMM and LILA can
> greatly aid us in furthering our own understanding of everyday experience(as
> well as reinterpreting our past experiences). I do not call this
> 'confining', I call it enriching.
>
> Does that mean then that the MOQ is 'confined' to your experience? Your
> dismissive attitude tends towards that conclusion Marsha, so who is doing
> the 'confining'?
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to