Marsha. Adrie,
I also wonder if you and Andre and dmb are all of the same ilk. You throw down raw, naked quotes and expect that a cogent argument and your heart's desire will suddenly formulate. It hasn't. This holds a very decent argument. I'm very short of time again, but allow me to recognise this as valid. Attempting to approach you in such a way that you do not feel isolated or unrecognised is difficult , especially in the frame David is working. i will try to stay away from the previous conversations to simplify the model a bit. Try this approach. William James started out as a painter.He needed to paint, he was a very creative person,the blood of an artist, the mind of a scientist, and the spirit of a philosopher. After some time, about a year, and taking lessons,he started to realise that for the painting he wanted to create the colors on the palet were insufficient. James needed all shades of the color gray, from the darkest to the lightest, every shade , but above, he was in need to formulate the question. Is gray a color? He started writing and formulated some answers in the Will To Believe, Talks to Teachers etc.... Okay, this was the beginning.....,is this a better approach? Adrie. 2011/3/8 MarshaV <[email protected]> > > Adrie, > > I also wonder if you and Andre and dmb are all of the same ilk. You > throw down raw, naked quotes and expect that a cogent argument > and your heart's desire will suddenly formulate. It hasn't. > > Mr. Pirsig can send a letter or email to Anthony to substantiate that > the MoQ should indeed be placed firmly within mainstream American > Pragmatism. Meanwhile, I'm holding to his October 2005 proclamation. > > Sorry... > > > Marsha > > > > > On Mar 8, 2011, at 8:02 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > > > > > > > > Maybe there will soon be the development of a new American > > Quality tradition, ;-) > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2011, at 7:55 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Adrie, > >> > >> So now you flood the discussion with quantity? I'm not buying into the > >> idea that the MoQ should be a form of American Pragmatism unless > >> you come up with a convincing argument the American version > >> of Zen Buddhism is a form of American Pragmatism, or that there are > >> no other philosophical traditions that might prove to relate to the MoQ. > >> Lila's Child was published in 2003. Dean Summers paper was completed > >> in 1994, while the RMP statement I offered was written in 2005. Which > >> do you suppose is more up-to-date and pertinent? You do the math. > >> > >> Marsha > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mar 7, 2011, at 5:46 PM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote: > >> > >>> For your information , Andre.(in regard of what David and you are > trying to > >>> explain) > >>> > >>> http://robertpirsig.org/Pragmatism.htm > >>> > >>> ... > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
