Hi Marsha On 28/03/2011 10:55, MarshaV wrote:
Stating that "sq is not other than DQ" does not leave sq out; it includes both
It may include both terms but all this statement does is negate "sq is other than DQ" - i.e."it is not the case that SQ is other than DQ" and that is what is being disputed! Merely re-stating your previous statement that "DQ is sq and sq is DQ" using different words is no improvement Static patterns are definable - DQ is not definable. Your statement says the opposite. Rather that both are definable or both are not. If something is definable then how is it equivalent to the non-definable - or vice-versa?
Horse -- "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid." — Frank Zappa Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
