Horse, Try this:
I haven't seen any argument that refutes that the fundamental nature of sq is DQ. Do you want to answer the question: Might you agree that ice is not other than water? Marsha On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Horse wrote: > Hi Marsha > > On 28/03/2011 10:55, MarshaV wrote: >> Stating that "sq is not other than DQ" does not leave sq out; it includes >> both > > It may include both terms but all this statement does is negate "sq is other > than DQ" - i.e."it is not the case that SQ is other than DQ" and that is what > is being disputed! Merely re-stating your previous statement that "DQ is sq > and sq is DQ" using different words is no improvement > Static patterns are definable - DQ is not definable. Your statement says the > opposite. Rather that both are definable or both are not. > If something is definable then how is it equivalent to the non-definable - or > vice-versa? > > Horse > > > -- > > "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production > deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid." > — Frank Zappa > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
