Horse, I might add that stating that 'Dynamic Quality' is undefinable is defining it.
Marsha On Mar 28, 2011, at 12:31 PM, MarshaV wrote: > > Horse, > > Try this: > > I haven't seen any argument that refutes that the fundamental nature of sq is > DQ. > > Do you want to answer the question: Might you agree that ice is not other > than water? > > > Marsha > > > > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Horse wrote: > >> Hi Marsha >> >> On 28/03/2011 10:55, MarshaV wrote: >>> Stating that "sq is not other than DQ" does not leave sq out; it includes >>> both >> >> It may include both terms but all this statement does is negate "sq is other >> than DQ" - i.e."it is not the case that SQ is other than DQ" and that is >> what is being disputed! Merely re-stating your previous statement that "DQ >> is sq and sq is DQ" using different words is no improvement >> Static patterns are definable - DQ is not definable. Your statement says the >> opposite. Rather that both are definable or both are not. >> If something is definable then how is it equivalent to the non-definable - >> or vice-versa? >> >> Horse >> >> >> -- >> >> "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production >> deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid." >> — Frank Zappa >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
