Hi David,

Pirsig spends a long time on Art / Rta / Crafts etc ... so you can't
reduce it to a single either or. There is no "it". That would be
reductionist.

Is art DQ or isn't it ? (As I said already, art is full of both kinds
of patterns - but the essential experience that distinguish the
artistic from non-artistic is clearly DQ.)

"dynamic" is clearly not the same as "Dynamic Quality" - one is
natural language one is an undefined split in some undefinable
metaphysical monad - sq is the defined part. I'm not the one trying to
define the undefinable.

I live the undefinable.
Ian

On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:10 AM, David Harding <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ian, Mark, et al.
>
> dynamic or Dynamic Quality?
>
> What's the difference?
>
> Are they the same thing?
>
> If they are, then aren't we all defining the undefinable when we say 
> something, such as Ian does with music below, is dynamic?
>
> If the MOQ really is a way to live ones life. Shouldn't we be able to say 
> then, what is and is not Dynamic Quality?  If the MOQ really is good then 
> shouldn't we be able to categorise something in either of the two boxes of 
> the first division of the MOQ?  I'm seeing a lot of people getting stuck on 
> this point and I think the blame can be laid on the use of this term 
> 'dynamic' which avoids the issue entirely.
>
> 'dynamic' muddies things where the first division of the MOQ brings clarity.
>
> So that said. Ian, is art Dynamic Quality or static quality?
>
>
>
> On 31/03/2011, at 10:32 PM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>
>> Ha, David,
>>
>> Attending (participating in) a musical event does not require any
>> lingusitic or intellectual conceptualization of the experience - so
>> you get a good dose of the dynamic. (Of course there are plenty of
>> patterns involved in the music and the concert ritual itself, but only
>> if you analyse them - you can feel the quality without doing that.)
>>
>> The source of many previous discussions on MD. You used the extreme
>> sports "buzz" example and others as things beyond our discourse - I
>> was just reinforcing your point.
>>
>> (The only reason I picked on Hawkwind and VdGG with a ;-) was knowing
>> Horse is a fan and had experienced the latter only the day before -
>> but you could substitute whatever artistic / cultural participation
>> event that turns you on.)
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:18 PM, David Harding <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Ian,
>>>
>>> I'll bite.  What does this have to do with the first division of the MOQ? 
>>> Is a Hawkwind or Van derGraaf Generator gig static quality or Dynamic 
>>> Quality?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30/03/2011, at 6:48 PM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi David (H)
>>>>
>>>> You summarised your impression of Mark's take thus:
>>>>
>>>> "If everything is static quality", you seem to say.. "then that
>>>> appears to be a very sad existence indeed."
>>>>
>>>> (You go on to point out lots of non-static things in real life ...)
>>>>
>>>> Mark's take hinges on the "everything" in the first clause being -
>>>> "everything that we can objectivise and discuss in language in a
>>>> metaphysics discussion forum (or anywhere else)". That would indeed be
>>>> a very sad existence, but of course life, the universe and everything
>>>> is a lot more than that, as you point out.
>>>>
>>>> As you perceive it's a source of frustration or sometimes confusion
>>>> for many on MD .... that we can only ever skirt around reality ... but
>>>> that is the reality of any discourse .... a reason why we need to meet
>>>> in the flesh at Hawkwind or Van derGraaf Generator gigs ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Metaphysics discusses meta-life and meta-reality, it's not real-life 
>>>> itself.
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to