Hi Dan, On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Dan Glover <[email protected]> wrote: [John] >> I mean geez, can't the meaning of a word be shifted from the exact spelling >> of >> your expectation? If Spirit as they were talking about, is the same as DQ >> as he's talking about. Spirit, apart from the dogmatic theories of any >> particular sect - that which drives the creation of ideas about gods and >> angels and sprites - THAT spirit IS DQ - the generator of the mythos. Two >> terms which end up meaning the same thing in essence. > > Dan: > I still don't think that is the spirit the Victorians were talking > about. Not at all. Spirit to them was a manifestation of God, the > Divine driving the mundane world. That is not what RMP means by > Dynamic Quality. > [Mark] No Dan, that IS exactly what RMP means by Dyanamic Quality. Perhaps you have a very narrow definition of God. I'm sorry Dave but God cannot be defined, and you know that. Each person has his own God. What are you saying, that the Victorians were stupid? That they had no personal awareness? They thought about things as much as any of us do.
We are much dumber now that we used to be. It is all due to this static quality that is not Spirit or God or Dynamic Quality, but an illusion. I thought you knew what static quality meant. Our separation from what is, has gone to extreme lengths in this Western world. RMP is trying to get us back to the garden. Cheers, Mark > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
