Hello everyone On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:39 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:29 PM, Dan Glover wrote: > >> Hello everyone >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Dan, >>> You seem to me to be implying that since values are consistant in their >>> choices >>> they >>> are incapable of altering those choices. That static patterns can not >>> change and >>> we >>> can not effect change in them. >> >> Dan: >> >> What I think the MOQ says is that static quality patterns cannot >> change by themselves. They change in response to Dynamic Quality. I >> believe RMP brings this up in the discussion about the Zuni brujo. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Dan > > > > Hi Dan, > > I'm curious how you interpret static patterns of value. If you are sitting > on your office > chair in the morning, and reading a book while sitting in a lounge chair in > the evening, > is there a difference in the static pattern of value representing chair, or > is the static > pattern of value some Platonic idea, or something else? > > Thank you for all your explanation.
Hi Marsha At the moment of intellectualization, I catagorize the chair according to social patterns that I have built up over my experience with chairs. So to answer your question, yes. Perhaps you could explain how this pertains to the discussion we are having? Thank you, Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
