On Apr 9, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Dan Glover wrote: > Hello everyone > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:39 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:29 PM, Dan Glover wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dan, >>>> You seem to me to be implying that since values are consistant in their >>>> choices >>>> they >>>> are incapable of altering those choices. That static patterns can not >>>> change and >>>> we >>>> can not effect change in them. >>> >>> Dan: >>> >>> What I think the MOQ says is that static quality patterns cannot >>> change by themselves. They change in response to Dynamic Quality. I >>> believe RMP brings this up in the discussion about the Zuni brujo. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Dan >> >> >> >> Hi Dan, >> >> I'm curious how you interpret static patterns of value. If you are sitting >> on your office >> chair in the morning, and reading a book while sitting in a lounge chair in >> the evening, >> is there a difference in the static pattern of value representing chair, or >> is the static >> pattern of value some Platonic idea, or something else? >> >> Thank you for all your explanation. > > Hi Marsha > > At the moment of intellectualization, I catagorize the chair according > to social patterns that I have built up over my experience with > chairs. So to answer your question, yes. > > Perhaps you could explain how this pertains to the discussion we are having? > > Thank you,
Marsha, It is my point that static value is relative and ever-changing, but changes within a stable, predictable pattern, rather than static value as fixed and discrete. Thank you. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
