Hi Dan, > I think you're being quite unfair. I've written a number of posts > concerning free will vs determinism. The "one small quote" is really > what this is all about. If you want to believe in free will, fine. > Believe in it. But the MOQ says what the MOQ says. That's what it > boils down to. You disagree with the MOQ. And I guess since I agree > with the MOQ, you also disagree with me. > > John chastised me for repeatedly bringing up the hot stove experiment. > But he still doesn't get it, as evidenced by his lastest Dynamic > Quality equals the future post. I don't know what else to do, Ron. I > am not a teacher. If someone doesn't get it, I tend to keep repeating > myself in hopes that, maybe, eventually, they will get it. Maybe > there is a better way. But I don't know that way. Teach me.
I think repeating is the best way. As you know I say - the only way to experience Dynamic Quality is though perfection of static quality. That is, going over something again and again and again until it's perfect. Not everyone sees things the same, but if you repeat sometimes a different phrasing or a different terminology people will realise what you are saying. Keep repeating Dan, it is appreciated and it does work. Small steps. -David. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
