Hi Dan, > Dan: > That is what Herrigal had such a difficult time with. Remember how he > practiced and practiced his archery while on hiatus from his lessons? > And when he returned to the master and shot what he thought was a > perfect shot? And how the master responded by immediately dropping him > from his teachings? > > Herrigal was trying to shoot rather than just shooting. To experience > Dynamic Quality, just experience. The sense of how it happens is a > static quality pattern that occurs later. So to try and talk about it > is to make the same mistake Herrigal made in trying to shoot rather > than just shooting.
I agree Dan, but why talk about it at all? Aren't you now using 'static patterns which occur later' to talk about it? All talk of Dynamic Quality is just that - static, and so by the very nature of static quality, some talking which points to Dynamic Quality is better than other talking. Therefore, Dan, my question still stands - From an MOQ perspective how did both the Mathematician and the Zen Archer experience Dynamic Quality? > >> David: >> How did the Mathematician and Zen Archer experience Dynamic Quality? > > Dan: > > They just experienced. Dynamic Quality is synonymous with experience. > There is no separation until we ask: how? I agree, but this doesn't explain how they experienced Dynamic Quality. As Ron asks: 'Where does the Dynamic Quality come from if there is nothing but static patterns?' I think this is a source of confusion for many. Simply saying "by not asking how - you can experience Dynamic Quality" doesn't answer Ron's question. What is the 'link' between Dynamic Quality and static quality. How does Dynamic Quality 'appear'? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
