Hi David, On Apr 27, 2011, at 9:17 AM, David Harding wrote:
> Hi Marsha, > >> If I write 'Form is emptiness; emptiness is form; form is not other than >> emptiness; emptiness is not other than form.' does it translate into "it >> doesn't really matter"? I'm not sure where you are headed. Has the subject >> become caring? > > I'm headed to asking you if you believe that the MOQ is Mysticism? If not, > what is the difference between the MOQ and Mysticism? Marsha: I have no knowledge of mysticism. The MoQ is an intellectual static pattern of value which points towards a better explanation of reality. AND the MoQ points to that which is beyond explanation/description. If you asked which I think is more important, I will answer both with the pointing beyond description more valuable by far. Why? I instinctually embraced the idea of patterns. The concept seems so right as a better way of defining self and things, from discrete entities to process. And to have them morally categorized seems also so good, really ingenious. Much, much, much better! But to experience what is beyond explanation/description is far more powerful. - Best to leave it at that. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
