Marsha: I agree.
On May 1, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Steven Peterson wrote: > Hi Marsha, > When Pirsig says, A causes be can be thought of as B values > precondition A. I added that there is nothing more to B (whatever the > collection pattern being thought about) > than such preferences since preference is another word value and > since in the MOQ everything identifiable is thought of as a pattern of > value or collection of patterns. > > Best, > Steve > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:19 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Apr 30, 2011, at 7:04 AM, Steven Peterson wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:13 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Greetings, >>>> >>>> Isn't free will dependent on causation, and isn't causation, in the MoQ, >>>> an explanatory extension of a pattern? >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes, causation is understood as a stable pattern of preference, B >>> routinely values precondition A. Further, B literally IS a set of such >>> preferences. >> >> >> HI Steve, >> >> I don't understand the last part of your statement: "Further, B literally >> IS a >> set of such preferences." Could you please elaborate. >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> Marsha > ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
