Hi Marsha,

Well, I finally made it to Williston, ND.  Nothing is as I thought it would
be.  The prairie intrigues me, however.  In California if you drive for more
than a couple of hours, the topography completely changes, here you can go
for days and it's all the same.  It's weirdly exhiliarating.

I dispute one part of your following definition:

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> dmb,
>
> Here's my definition of Dynamic Quality and static quality.
>
> For me, Dynamic Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
>


John:

Unknowable?  What does that mean?  It seems to me to contradict the basic
tenant of the MoQ which is that while Quality is indefinable - you KNOW
"WHAT IT IS.  As the most empirical of all reality, how can we not know DQ?


That's my question.

by all means, take your time in thinking out a response to my query.  Who
knows when I'll have a chance to wifi again.  And my laptop is making
squeaky noises on startup and refusing to respond to the on button unless I
turn it upside down.  I think it got bumped off the bed in the RV one two
many times on shakey North Dakotan roads.

Take care,

John truckin' on. (sans truck)
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to