On May 14, 2011, at 12:32 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> dmb said to Marsha:
> ...The problem is that your definitions defy logic, dictionaries and Pirsig's 
> text. How could your definitions be any worse? I honestly can't imagine how 
> they could be any more confused. ...In the last sentence, for example, you 
> describe static patterns as stable AND ever-changing. That's like saying 
> stable structures are fluid, which is exactly what they are not. That's not 
> my definition. That's just what the words mean. That's what they meant before 
> you and I were born. That's how Pirsig and other english speakers use the 
> term. But apparently you're just not capable of understanding or meeting the 
> most basic requirements of communication. 
> 
> Marsha replied to dmb:
> They make sense to me. 
> 
> dmb says:
> Again, the criticism is that your definitions defy logic, dictionaries and 
> Pirsig's text.

Marsha:
Your opinion...   I am trying to enlarge and improve my understanding of the 
MoQ.     

> dmb:
> You have never successfully responded to the substance of that complaint.

Marsha:
It's opinion.  


> dmb:
> You only ever retreat into solipsism, mysticism, feminism or otherwise think 
> up some bullshit reason to avoid responsibility for your own thoughts and 
> actions. 

Marsha:
More ad hominemery.


> dmb:
> And your standard of intelligibility is making sense to yourself? Wow.

Marsha:
I sure wouldn't use you as a standard.  


> You really don't see how idiotic that is?

Marsha:
Attack, attack, attack.  


> dmb:
> Making up your own definitions of english words is like printing your own 
> money. You can do it but you'll soon discover how worthless it is when you 
> try to spend it anywhere.
> Or try going into a store with a five-dollar bill and explain to the clerk 
> that you define "five" to mean "a hundred". See, money only works as a medium 
> of exchange when we co-operate as to its meaning and value and you are hack 
> counterfeiter. Your definitions are as valid as a wooden nickel and only a 
> fool would take your bogus coins. 


Marsha:
Hyperbole and finger-wagging, but no substance.


> dmb:
> As anyone with a dictionary can see, "static" is a term contrasted with and 
> opposed to the term "dynamic" and vice versa. As anyone with a copy of Lila 
> can see, "static" and "dynamic" are similarly contrasted and opposed within 
> the MOQ. Your apparently inability to grasp such basic concepts is actually 
> pretty bizarre. Do you really not understand that language is a collective 
> property? Do you really not see how communication is utterly destroyed by 
> altering whatever meanings and definitions you like?

Marsha:
Hyperbole and nonsense...  

> dmb:
> This pattern of behavior goes way beyond dumb. It's crazy. 

Marsha:
More ad hominemery.  (Like the word?  It's easy to write, and near impossible 
to pronounce.)  


> static |ˈstatik|adjective1 lacking in movement, action, or change, esp. in a 
> way viewed as undesirable or uninteresting : demand has grown in what was a 
> fairly static market | the whole ballet appeared too static.• Computing (of a 
> process or variable) not able to be changed during a set period, for example, 
> while a program is running.2 Physics concerned with bodies at rest or forces 
> in equilibrium. Often contrasted with dynamic .
> 
> dynamic |dīˈnamik|adjective1 (of a process or system) characterized by 
> constant change, activity, or progress : a dynamic economy.• (of a person) 
> positive in attitude and full of energy and new ideas : she's dynamic and 
> determined.• (of a thing) stimulating development or progress : the dynamic 
> forces of nature.• Physics of or relating to forces producing motion. Often 
> contrasted with static .• Linguistics (of a verb) expressing an action, 
> activity, event, or process. Contrasted with stative .    

Marsha:
Didn't you learn your lesson with demanding the standard seven-word dictionary 
definition for 'reify'?   Then suddenly on February 19th, you finally 
acknowledge a broader meaning.   

---

Like to remind you:  the motorcycle that is to be worked on is YOURSELF.    Do 
you have you work done?   



Marsha   

 






 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to