Andre said to Marsha:
... it seems to me you are making the same mistake Bodvar made: you are
equating experience with the MOQ. ..But the MOQ is NOT experience! It is not
your experience. It may point towards it but it is not your experience. For
goodness sake. It is an intellectual representation of it. An idea. ... The old
adage again: DQ is NOT to be confused with sq. sq is NOT to be confused with
DQ. '
Yep. That's exactly what Pirsig said in his 2005 summary of the MOQ (Which Bo
thinks is "stupid"):"The Metaphysics of Quality itself is static and should be
separated from the Dynamic Quality it talks about. Like the rest of the printed
philosophic tradition it doesn't change from day to day, although the world it
talks about does."
Pirsig says the same thing in ZAMM and Lila and Lila's Child. He's been quite
clear and consistent on this point but some people won't see it no matter how
many ways it's said.
Sigh.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
