Andre said to Marsha:
You asked how DQ/sq can be separated in 'any meaningful way'. Pirsig has done
so and I provided some relevant sections from Anthony's PhD and referred you to
LILA wherein this is discussed. You have not addressed this in your response.
Instead you respond by asking an irrelevant and insinuating question.
dmb says:
Exactly. Marsha is disputing the MOQ's central distinction against overwhelming
textual evidence, against logic, and in opposition to every english dictionary.
In order to maintain her ridiculously contradictory definition of static
patterns (as ever-changing clouds of probability), she has to ignore and/or
misconstrue both of Pirsig's books, his 2005 summary of the MOQ, Ant's textbook
and dissertation on the MOQ, the comments Pirsig added for Dan's book and even
the texts she brings to the table. It's really quite astonishing and
spectacular in its own way.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
